What Happens Next To The U.S. Vs. Google Antitrust Case? via @sejournal, @AlliBerry3

With the punishment for Google’s archetypal hunt antitrust lawsuit expected to beryllium delivered successful August 2025, the looming question is what volition hap present with a caller U.S. President and a caller acceptable of Department of Justice (DOJ) appointees.

Early signs suggest the Trump medication volition mostly enactment the people of the Biden medication erstwhile it comes to antitrust enforcement against ample tech companies, including Google.

Their rationale is drastically antithetic from that of the erstwhile administration, but the caller nominations and appointments for the DOJ suggest that President Trump is superior astir holding Google accountable, adjacent if their preferred remedies whitethorn differ.

Before we get into it, let’s recap what has happened truthful far.

The U.S. Vs. Google Case

In August 2024, Federal Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google violated the U.S. antitrust law by maintaining an amerciable monopoly done exclusive agreements it had with companies similar Apple to beryllium the world’s default hunt motor connected smartphones and web browsers.

Additionally, Google was recovered blameworthy of monopolizing wide hunt substance advertizing due to the fact that Google was capable to rise prices connected hunt advertizing products higher than what the authorities claimed would person been expected oregon imaginable successful a just market.

Potential Remedies For Google

The DOJ submitted 2 filings with their suggestions to remediate Google’s monopolistic actions.

Proposed remedies scope from restrictions connected deals that diagnostic Google’s hunt motor arsenic the default connected browsers and devices each the mode to a breakup of the institution by forcing the merchantability of Google’s browser Chrome.

Other intriguing remedies that person been proposed see syndicating the Google hunt algorithm to competitors, forced licensing of advertisement feeds to competitors, and divesting the Android operating system.

The DOJ nether Biden made it wide successful their most caller filing connected November 20, 2024, that divesting Chrome is their preferred option, on with the discontinuation of exclusive agreements with browsers and telephone companies.

The implications of divesting Chrome are besides the astir wide-reaching – not lone is Chrome utilized by astir two-thirds of the world’s net users, but we learned done this proceedings that click information from Chrome is utilized to bid the hunt algorithms utilizing Navboost, helping Google support its competitory edge.

Losing Chrome’s information would astir surely warrant a drastically antithetic Google hunt engine.

Google filed its effect to the DOJ, arguing that the projected remedies are overmuch wider reaching than what the lawsuit was astir and that America’s planetary enactment presumption successful tech could beryllium hindered by this.

Instead, they projected allowing exclusive agreements to beryllium made with companies similar Apple and Mozilla, but with the quality to acceptable a antithetic default hunt motor connected antithetic platforms and browsing modes.

It besides projected that Android instrumentality manufacturers could preload aggregate hunt engines, arsenic good arsenic preload Google apps without Google Search oregon Chrome.

Both sides volition instrumentality to tribunal for the remedies litigation successful May 2025, with a ruling expected to beryllium delivered successful August 2025.

What Happens Now

Back to the question astatine hand: What happens erstwhile Trump takes office?

The archetypal signals, including Trump’s nominations for cardinal roles astatine the FTC and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, suggest the medication volition proceed to usage a dense manus against ample tech companies facing antitrust troubles similar Google. But, their solutions whitethorn disagree from the existent projected remedies.

Trump’s Relevant Nominees

Trump has nominated respective cardinal individuals who volition power antitrust enforcement, peculiarly concerning Big Tech companies.

These appointments bespeak that the crackdown connected tech giants volition apt continue, successful effect, a astonishing bipartisan effort. Trump’s cardinal nominees include:

• Gail Slater: Nominated to pb the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, Slater has a inheritance arsenic a argumentation advisor to Vice President-elect J.D. Vance and acquisition successful tech argumentation astatine the National Economic Council. If confirmed, she would inherit the antitrust lawsuit against Google.
• Andrew N. Ferguson: Appointed arsenic Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Ferguson has expressed intentions to reassess the agency’s attack to mergers and acquisitions, which has been uncommonly beardown against mergers and acquisitions, portion inactive maintaining oversight of ascendant tech platforms.
• Mark Meador: Appointed arsenic an FTC Commissioner, a relation antecedently held by Ferguson, Meador is recognized for his pro-enforcement stance, particularly regarding exertion companies, successful his erstwhile enactment with the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. His erstwhile enactment includes drafting authorities aimed astatine addressing competitory practices successful the tech industry.

While each 3 of these nominees are profoundly rooted successful the Republican party, they are each agreed successful their pro-enforcement stances erstwhile it comes to Big Tech.

This is simply a departure from the emblematic Republican pro-business, anti-regulation position, signifying Trump’s seriousness successful curbing the powerfulness of Google and different tech giants.

The Trump Administration’s Views On Google’s Antitrust Case

Trump’s disdain for Big Tech companies, including Google, has been accordant since his archetypal presidency.

Why does helium hatred Google truthful much? A mates of reasons look astir likely:

1. He has claimed the search motor is “rigged” due to the fact that it presents antagonistic stories astir him.
2. He sees weakening Big Tech companies arsenic a mode to beforehand “free speech” due to the fact that of their misinformation moderation policies and claims the hunt results are biased against conservatives.

Despite this seemingly changeless presumption against Google, President Trump has besides suggested that breaking Google up may destruct the company alternatively than assistance beforehand fairness and competition.

He has besides warned that breaking up Google whitethorn marque the U.S. look weaker to overseas powers due to the fact that “China is acrophobic of Google.”

Elsewhere successful the administration, Vice President Vance has antecedently called for the breakup of Google and praised the Biden administration’s Federal Trade Commission Chair, Lina Khan, for her assertive attack to antitrust enforcement.

Whether they determine to instrumentality a stance that is pro-breaking Google up remains to beryllium seen, but it appears that they volition beryllium taking bureau with a tendency to fortify contention successful this market.

Final Thoughts

There is simply a batch of clip betwixt Trump taking bureau and the remedies litigation starting up again for the lawsuit against Google successful May 2025.

The DOJ inactive needs to reason wherefore they judge Google should beryllium forced to merchantability Chrome, and if this is nary longer the content of the DOJ appointees, they volition request to reason wherefore different remedies marque much sense.

It seems tenable to assume, based connected the appointees, that they volition beryllium taking immoderate large swings astatine Google and arguing for the remedies that they judge would beryllium astir effectual astatine enhancing competition.

If you are idiosyncratic who believes enactment needs to beryllium taken against Google, Trump’s existent anti-Google stance whitethorn enactment successful your favour careless of whether you hold with his rationale for it.

More Resources:

• Google: 5 Ways DOJ Proposals Harm Business and Consumers
• Google Faces Potential Breakup: How DOJ Ruling Could Reshape Search
• State Of SEO 2025

Featured Image: PanuShot/Shutterstock