Monopoly: A Ruling Against Google Could Benefit The Open Web via @sejournal, @Kevin_Indig

Boost your skills with Growth Memo’s play adept insights. Subscribe for free!

4 years aft the DOJ suit against Google started, Judge Amit Mehta declared Google blameworthy of monopolizing online hunt and advertizing markets. The astir palmy startup successful past is officially an amerciable monopoly.

Google’s hunt motor marketplace stock (Image Credit: Kevin Indig).

The ruling itself is big, but the abdominous question successful the country is what consequences travel and whether determination is an interaction connected SEO.

I can’t look into the future, but I tin tally done scenarios. There is simply a bully accidental it volition impact SEO and the unfastened web.

Before we dive in, remember:

1. I’m not a lawyer oregon ineligible expert.
2. I solely trust connected documents and insights from the tribunal lawsuit for my opinion.
3. When I notation to “the document”, I mean Judge Mehta’s sentiment memorandum.1

Scenarios

Scenario readying is the creation and subject of envisioning aggregate futures.

Step 1 is framing the key question: What mightiness the remedies (consequences) of the suit against Google be, and what imaginable consequences could effect for SEO?

Step 2 is identifying the driving forces affecting the cardinal question:

• Legal:
  • Judge Mehta concludes that Google is an illegal search monopoly, not an advertising monopoly. This is important.
  • The defining precedent suit against Microsoft successful the 90s didn’t pb to a break-up of the institution but the opening of APIs, sharing of cardinal accusation and a alteration successful concern practices.
• Economic:
  • Google faces contention successful advertizing from Amazon, TikTok and Meta.
  • Google has superior marketplace stock successful search, browsers, mobile OS and different markets.
  • Exclusivity and gross stock agreements betwixt Google, Apple, Samsung, Mozilla and different partners delivered monolithic postulation to Google and profits to partners.
• Technological:
  • Apple agreed not to innovate successful search, spotlight and instrumentality hunt successful instrumentality for gross share.
  • Large Language Models are successful the process of changing however hunt works and the dynamics betwixt searchers, hunt engines and contented providers.
• Social: Younger generations usage TikTok to hunt and societal networks to get quality and different information.
• Political:
  • The sentiment of “big tech” has turned mostly negative.
  • After astir 2 decades of nary anti-competitive enactment against tech companies, the Google suit could commencement a question of tech regulation.

Step 3 is defining scenarios based connected the cardinal question and driving forces. I spot 3 imaginable scenarios:

Scenario 1: Google indispensable extremity its exclusivity deals immediately. Apple needs to fto users take a default hunt motor erstwhile mounting up their devices. Google could get hefty fines for each twelvemonth they support the declaration with Apple going.

Scenario 2: Google gets breached up. Alphabet indispensable rotation disconnected assets that forestall it from gaining and holding much powerfulness successful hunt and support different players from entering the market.

• YouTube is the 2nd largest hunt motor (Google is the largest substance hunt engine, according to the judge). Running some astatine the aforesaid clip creates excessively overmuch powerfulness for 1 institution to own.
• Chrome and Android – possibly Gmail – request to beryllium divested due to the fact that they habituate users to take Google and supply captious information astir idiosyncratic behavior. A bully illustration for the “damage” oregon habituation is Neeva, which failed due to the fact that it couldn’t person users to alteration their wont of utilizing Google, according to laminitis Sridhar Ramaswamy.
• Alphabet tin support Maps due to the fact that determination is contention from Apple.

Scenario 3: Google indispensable stock information similar click behaviour with the unfastened marketplace truthful everyone tin bid hunt engines connected it.

Scenarios 2 and 3 are messy and could perchance harm consumers (privacy). Scenario 1 is the astir apt to happen. To me, the statement “If Google is the champion hunt engine, wherefore does it request to wage to beryllium the default connected devices?” checks out.

Polygamy

Let’s look astatine the consequences for Google, Apple, and the web nether the lens of script 1: Apple needs to extremity its monogamous narration with Google and fto users take which hunt motor they privation arsenic default erstwhile mounting up their phones.

1/ Consequence For Google

Apple’s interaction connected Google Search is massive. The tribunal documents uncover that 28% of Google searches (US) travel from Safari and constitution 56% of hunt volume. Consider that Apple sees 10 cardinal searches per week across each of its devices, with 8 cardinal happening connected Safari and 2 cardinal from Siri and Spotlight.

“Google receives lone 7.6% of each queries connected Apple devices done user-downloaded Chrome” and “10% of its searches connected Apple devices done the Google Search App (GSA).” Google would instrumentality a large deed without the exclusive statement with Apple.

Google searches for “best hunt engine” vs. “google alternative” (Image Credit: Kevin Indig)

If Apple lets users take a hunt engine, 30% of searches from iOS and 70% from MacOS could spell to non-Google hunt engines: “In 2020, Google estimated that if it mislaid the Safari default placement, it would claw backmost much hunt measurement connected desktop than connected mobile.” Apparently, users are little inclined to alteration their default hunt motor connected mobile devices.

Google would instrumentality a large deed but past due to the fact that its marque is truthful beardown that adjacent worse hunt results wouldn’t scare users away. From the document:

In 2020, Google conducted a prime degradation study, which showed that it would not suffer hunt gross if were to importantly trim the prime of its hunt product. Just arsenic the powerfulness to rise terms “when it is desired to bash so” is impervious of monopoly power, truthful excessively is the quality to degrade merchandise prime without interest of losing consumers […]. The information that Google makes merchandise changes without interest that its users mightiness spell elsewhere is thing lone a steadfast with monopoly powerfulness could do.

Most of you had immoderate feelings astir this trial erstwhile I brought it up on Twitter.

2/ Consequence For Apple

Apple wouldn’t beryllium capable to marque different exclusive deal. I uncertainty that the tribunal would forbid lone Google to marque organisation agreements.

Even if Apple could spouse with idiosyncratic else, they don’t privation to: Eddy Cue, Apple’s elder vice president of Services, said publically successful court, “There’s nary terms that Microsoft could ever offer“ to regenerate Google. “They offered to springiness america Bing for free. They could springiness america the full company.” Woof.

But Apple’s bottommost enactment would surely instrumentality a hit. In the abbreviated term, Apple would miss astir $20 cardinal from Google, which makes up 11.5% of its $173 cardinal profits (trailing the past 12 months successful Q1 ‘24). In the agelong term, the losses would magnitude to $12 cardinal implicit 5 years:

Internal Apple appraisal from 2018, which concluded that, adjacent assuming that Apple would clasp 80% of queries should it motorboat a GSE, it would suffer implicit $12 cardinal successful gross during the archetypal 5 years pursuing a imaginable separation from Google.

Mind you, not lone Apple’s bottommost enactment would instrumentality a hit, but besides Google’s different organisation partners. Mozilla, for example, gets implicit 80% of its gross from Google.2 Without the gross share, it’s apt the institution wouldn’t survive. Bing should bargain Mozilla to support the institution live and somewhat equilibrium Google’s powerfulness with Chrome.

3/ Consequence For The web

The web could beryllium the large victor from a separation of Google’s organisation agreements. More postulation to different hunt engines could effect successful a broader organisation of web traffic. Here is my thought process:

1. Search is simply a zero-sum crippled that follows Zipf’s instrumentality successful click distribution: the archetypal effect gets a batch much clicks than the second, which gets much than the 3rd and truthful on.
2. In theory, you tin get near-infinite scope connected societal networks due to the fact that they customize the provender for audiences. On Google, the provender is not customized, meaning determination are lone truthful galore results for a keyword.
3. If much users would usage different hunt engines connected Apple devices, those non-Google hunt engines get much traffic, which they could walk connected to the web.
4. Assuming not each hunt motor would fertile the aforesaid tract astatine the apical (otherwise, what’s the point?), the disposable magnitude of postulation for websites would grow due to the fact that determination are present much hunt results crossed respective hunt engines that websites could get postulation from.

The large question is, “How galore users would take hunt engines that are not google if fixed a choice?” Google estimated successful 2020 that it would suffer $28.2 – $32.7 cardinal successful nett gross (~$30 cardinal to support the mathematics simple) and implicit treble that successful gross gross from losing 30% of iOS searches and 70% of MacOS.

Net gross is the magnitude of wealth from selling goods oregon services minus discounts, returns, oregon deductions. Since we don’t person that number, we person to usage full revenues arsenic a ceiling due to the fact that we cognize that nett gross has to beryllium little than revenue.

In 2020, Google’s full gross was $182.5 billion, meaning~$30 cardinal would beryllium 16.5% of full revenue. The existent fig is apt higher.

Other hunt engines would apt drawback immoderate of Google’s mislaid revenue. A survey by DuckDuckGo from 2019 3 recovered that mobile marketplace stock of non-Google hunt engines would summation by 300%-800% if users could take a default.

The adjacent logical question is “Who would get the hunt postulation Google loses?” Bing and DuckDuckGo are the evident ones, but what astir Perplexity and OpenAI? As I wrote in Search GPT:

OpenAI mightiness stake connected regulators breaking up Google’s exclusive hunt engine deal with Apple and anticipation to become portion of a hunt motor prime set on Apple devices.

At the clip of writing, I thought the likelihood of OpenAI intentionally launching Search GPT to drawback immoderate of the Apple postulation is small. I don’t deliberation that anymore.

If Open AI got conscionable 10% of the $30b successful gross Google would lose, it could marque up implicit fractional of the $5b successful yearly expenses it runs connected now. And each that without having to physique overmuch much functionality. Good timing.

According to Judge Mehta, Chat GPT is not considered a hunt engine: “AI cannot regenerate the cardinal gathering blocks of search, including web crawling, indexing, and ranking.”

I don’t agree, for what it’s worth. Most LLMs crushed answers successful hunt results. From What Google I/O 2023 reveals astir the aboriginal of SEO:

Most hunt engines usage a tech called Retrieval Augmented Generation, which cross-references AI answers from LLMs (large connection models) with classical hunt results to alteration hallucination.

2nd-Order Effects

I privation to instrumentality my scenarios 1 measurement further to uncover 2nd-order effects:

First, Would lone Apple beryllium forced to fto users take a default hunt motor erstwhile mounting up their instrumentality oregon could Android arsenic well? Mobile operating systems could beryllium seen arsenic a marketplace bottleneck to hunt traffic.

A broad ruling for each mobile OSs could mean that Google has to fto users take and perchance suffer immoderate of the advantages of owning Android.

Second, if Google were forced to chopped each organisation agreements, it would person ~$25b to spend. What would they bash with the money? Would it simply compensate for the ~$30 cardinal it would suffer by taking a monolithic deed successful Apple hunt traffic?

Third, if Apple wasn’t contractually obligated to not innovate successful Search crossed Spotlight, Safari, and Siri, would it physique its ain hunt engine?

It mightiness beryllium amended disconnected gathering what comes aft hunt and/or complaint to usage LLMs. The tribunal documents uncover that Apple estimated a outgo of astatine slightest $6 cardinal per twelvemonth to physique a wide hunt engine.