What The Google Antitrust Verdict Could Mean For The Future Of SEO via @sejournal, @AlliBerry3

In August 2024, Google mislaid its archetypal large antitrust lawsuit successful the U.S. Department of Justice vs. Google.

While we each gained immoderate absorbing insights astir however Google’s algorithm works (hello, NavBoost!), knowing the implications of this nonaccomplishment for Google arsenic a concern is not the easiest to unravel. Hence, this article.

There’s inactive plentifulness we don’t cognize astir Google’s aboriginal arsenic a effect of this trial, but it’s wide determination volition beryllium consequences ahead.

Even though Google representatives person said they volition entreaty the decision, some sides are already moving connected proposals for however to reconstruct competition, which volition beryllium decided by August 2025.

My important different is simply a firm lawyer, and this proceedings has been a predominant taxable astatine the meal array implicit the people of the past year.

We travel from antithetic nonrecreational backgrounds, but we person been arsenic invested successful the result – some for our respective careers and industries. His position has helped maine amended grasp the imaginable ineligible and concern outcomes that could beryllium up for Google.

I volition interruption that down for you successful this article, on with what that could mean for the SEO manufacture and Search at-large.

Background: The Case Against Google

In August 2024, Federal Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google violated the U.S. antitrust instrumentality by maintaining an amerciable monopoly done exclusive agreements it had with companies similar Apple to beryllium the world’s default hunt motor connected smartphones and web browsers.

During the case, we learned that Google paid Apple $20 cardinal successful 2022 to beryllium the default hunt motor connected its Safari browser, frankincense making it intolerable for different hunt engines similar DuckDuckGo oregon Bing to compete.

This lawsuit ruling besides recovered Google blameworthy of monopolizing wide hunt substance advertizing due to the fact that Google was capable to rise prices connected advertisement products higher than what would person been imaginable successful a escaped market.

Those ads are sold via Google Ads (formerly AdWords) and let marketers to tally ads against hunt keywords related to their business.

Note: There is simply a 2nd antitrust case inactive underway astir whether Google has created amerciable monopolies with unfastened web show advertisement exertion arsenic well. Closing arguments volition beryllium heard for that successful November 2024 with a verdict to follow

Remedies Proposed By The DOJ

On Oct. 8, 2024, the DOJ filed proposed antitrust remedies for Google. Until this point, determination has been plentifulness of speculation astir imaginable solutions.

Now, we cognize that the DOJ volition beryllium seeking remedies successful 4 “categories of harm”:

1. Search Distribution and Revenue Sharing.
2. Accumulation and Use of Data.
3. Generation and Display of Search Results.
4. Advertising Scale and Monetization.

The pursuing sections item imaginable remedies the DOJ projected successful that filing.

Ban On Exclusive Contracts

In bid to code Google’s hunt organisation and gross sharing, it is apt that we volition spot a prohibition connected exclusive contracts going guardant for Google.

In the Oct. 8 filing, the DOJ outlined exploring limiting oregon prohibiting default agreements, pre-installation agreements, and different revenue-sharing agreements related to hunt and search-related products.

Given this is what the lawsuit was centered around, it seems astir apt that we volition spot immoderate spirit of this outcome, and that could supply caller incentives for innovation astir hunt astatine Apple.

Apple Search Engine?

Judge Mehta noted successful his judgement that Apple had periodically considered gathering its ain hunt technology, but decided against it erstwhile an investigation successful 2018 concluded Apple would suffer much than $12 cardinal successful gross during the archetypal 5 years if they broke up with Google.

If Google were nary longer capable to person agreements of this nature, we whitethorn yet spot Apple look with a hunt motor of its own.

According to a Bloomberg report successful October 2023, Apple has been “tinkering” with hunt exertion for years.

It has a ample hunt squad dedicated to a next-generation hunt motor for Apple’s apps called “Pegasus,” which has already rolled retired successful immoderate apps.

And its improvement of Spotlight to assistance users find things crossed their devices has started adding web results to this instrumentality pointing users to sites that reply hunt queries.

Apple already has a web crawler called Applebot that finds sites it tin supply users successful Siri and Spotlight. It has besides built its ain hunt engines for immoderate of its services similar the App Store, Maps, Apple TV, and News.

Apple purchased a institution called Laserlike successful 2019, which is an AI-based hunt motor founded by erstwhile Google employees. Apple’s instrumentality learning squad has been seeking caller engineers to enactment connected hunt technologies arsenic well.

All of these could beryllium important infrastructure for a caller hunt engine.

Implications For SEO

If users are fixed much choices successful their default hunt engine, immoderate whitethorn stray distant from Google, which could chopped its marketplace share.

However, arsenic of now, Google is inactive thought of arsenic the person successful hunt quality, truthful it’s hard to gauge however overmuch would realistically alteration if exclusive contracts were banned.

A caller hunt motor from Apple would evidently beryllium an absorbing development. It would beryllium a caller algorithm to test, understand, and optimize for.

Knowing that users are bare for different prime option, radical would apt clasp Apple successful this space, and it could make a important magnitude of users, if the results are precocious capable quality. Quality is truly key.

Search is the astir utilized instrumentality connected smartphones, tablets, and computers. Apple has the users that Google needs.

Without Apple’s concern with Google, Apple has the imaginable to disrupt this space. It tin connection a much integrated hunt acquisition than immoderate different institution retired there. And its committedness to privateness is appealing to galore long-time Google users.

The DOJ would apt presumption this arsenic a triumph arsenic good due to the fact that Apple is 1 of the fewer companies ample capable to afloat vie crossed the hunt abstraction with Google.

Required Sharing Of Data To Competitors

Related to the accumulation and usage of information harm Google has caused, the DOJ is considering a remedy that forces Google to licence its information to competitors similar Bing oregon DuckDuckGo.

The antitrust ruling recovered that Google’s contracts guarantee that Google gets the astir idiosyncratic data, and that information streams besides support its competitors from improving their hunt results to vie better.

In the Oct. 8 filing, the DOJ is considering forcing Google to make: 1) the indexes, data, fees, and models utilized for Google search, including those utilized successful AI-assisted hunt features, and 2) Google hunt results, features, and ads, including the underlying ranking signals disposable via API.

Believe it oregon not, this solution has precedent, though surely not astatine the aforesaid standard arsenic what is being projected for Google.

The DOJ required AT&T to supply royalty-free licenses to its patents successful 1956, and required Microsoft to marque immoderate of its APIs disposable to 3rd parties for escaped aft they mislaid an antitrust lawsuit successful 1999.

Google has argued that determination are idiosyncratic privateness concerns related to information sharing. The DOJ’s effect is that it is considering prohibiting Google from utilizing oregon retaining information that cannot beryllium shared with others due to the fact that of privateness concerns.

Implications For SEO

Should Google beryllium required to bash immoderate of this, it would beryllium an unprecedented triumph for the unfastened web. It is overwhelming to deliberation of the possibilities if immoderate of these repercussions were to travel to fruition.

We would yet beryllium capable to spot down the curtain of the algorithm and ranking signals astatine play. There would beryllium a existent unfastened contention to physique rival hunt engines.

If Google were nary longer to usage personalized data, we mightiness spot the extremity of personalized hunt results based connected your hunt history, which has pros and cons.

I would besides beryllium funny what would hap to Google Discover since that merchandise provides contented based connected your browsing history.

The flip broadside of this imaginable result is that it volition beryllium easier than ever to gamify hunt results again, astatine slightest successful the abbreviated term.

If everyone knew what makes pages fertile successful Google, we would beryllium backmost successful the aboriginal days of SEO, erstwhile we could easy manipulate rank.

But if others instrumentality the hunt algorithm and physique upon it successful antithetic ways, possibly that wouldn’t beryllium arsenic large of a interest successful the agelong term.

Opting Out Of SERP Features

The DOJ filing concisely touched connected 1 intriguing remedy for the harm Google has caused regarding the procreation and show of hunt results.

The DOJ lawyers are proposing that website publishers person the quality to opt retired of Google features oregon products they privation to.

This would see Google’s AI Overviews, which they springiness arsenic an example, but it could besides see each different SERP features wherever Google relies connected websites and different contented created by 3rd parties – successful different words, each of them.

Because Google has held this monopoly, publishers person had virtually nary bargaining powerfulness with Google successful regards to being included successful SERP features without risking implicit exclusion from Google.

This solution would assistance publishers person much power implicit however they amusement up successful the hunt results.

Implications For SEO

This could beryllium perchance immense for SEO if the DOJ does so determination guardant with requiring Google to let publishers to opt retired of immoderate and each features and products they privation without exclusion successful Google’s results altogether.

There are plentifulness of website publishers who bash not privation Google to beryllium capable to usage their contented to bid its AI products, and privation to opt retired of AI Overviews.

When featured snippets archetypal came about, determination was a akin absorption to those.

Based connected the query, featured snippets and AI Overviews person the quality to assistance oregon harm website postulation numbers, but it’s intriguing to deliberation determination could beryllium a prime successful the substance of inclusion.

Licensing Of Ad Feeds

To code advertizing standard and monetization harm caused by Google, the DOJ filing provided a fewer half-baked solutions related to hunt substance advertising.

Because Google holds a 91% marketplace stock of hunt successful the U.S., different hunt engines person struggled to monetize done advertising.

One solution is to necessitate Google to licence oregon syndicate its advertisement provender autarkic of its hunt results. This way, different hunt engines could amended monetize by utilizing Google’s advertizing feed.

It is besides looking astatine remedies to supply much transparent and elaborate reporting to advertisers astir hunt substance advertisement auctions and monetization, and the quality to opt retired of Google hunt features similar keyword enlargement and wide lucifer that advertisers don’t privation to partake in.

Implications For SEO

I don’t spot evident implications for SEO, but determination are plentifulness for our friends successful PPC.

While licensing the Google advertisement provender is intriguing successful bid to assistance different hunt engines monetize, it doesn’t get astatine the contented of Google overcharging advertisers successful their auctions.

More thought and creativity mightiness beryllium needed present to find a solution that would marque consciousness for some creating much contention successful hunt and fairness for advertisers.

They are surely connected the close way with much transparency successful reporting and allowing advertisers to opt retired of programs they don’t privation to beryllium portion of.

Breaking Up Of Google

The DOJ lawyers are besides considering “structural remedies” similar forcing Google to merchantability disconnected parts of its business, similar the Chrome browser oregon the Android operating system.

Divesting Android is the remedy that has been discussed the most. It would beryllium different mode to forestall Google from having a presumption of powerfulness implicit instrumentality makers and requiring them to participate into agreements for entree to different Google merchandise apps similar Gmail oregon Google Play.

If the DOJ forced Google to merchantability Chrome, that would conscionable beryllium different mode to unit them to halt utilizing the information from it to pass the hunt algorithm.

There are behavioral remedies already mentioned that could arguably execute the aforesaid thing, and without the banal market-shattering interaction of a forced breakup.

That said, depending connected the result of the U.S. election, we could spot a DOJ that feels empowered to instrumentality bigger swings, truthful this whitethorn inactive beryllium connected the table.

The superior contented with this remedy is that Google’s gross mostly comes from hunt advertising. So, if the extremity is to trim its marketplace share, would breaking up smaller areas of the concern truly execute that?

Implications For SEO

If Android became a stand-alone business, I don’t spot implications for SEO due to the fact that it isn’t straight related to search.

Also, Apple controls truthful overmuch of the applicable mobile marketplace that spinning Android disconnected would person small to nary effect successful regards to addressing monopolistic practices.

If Chrome were sold, Google would suffer the invaluable idiosyncratic signals that pass Navboost successful the algorithm.

That would person immoderate larger implications for the prime of its results since we know, done proceedings testimony, that those Chrome idiosyncratic signals are heavy weighted successful the algorithm.

How overmuch of an interaction that would person connected the results whitethorn lone beryllium known wrong Google, oregon possibly not adjacent there, but it could beryllium material.

Final Thoughts

There is truthful overmuch to beryllium decided successful the twelvemonth (potentially years) to travel regarding Google’s fate.

While each of the caller headlines absorption connected the anticipation of Google being breached up, I deliberation this is simply a little apt outcome.

While divesting Chrome whitethorn beryllium connected the table, it seems similar determination are easier ways to execute the government’s goals.

And Android and Google Play are some escaped to customers and trust connected open-source code, truthful mandating changes to them doesn’t look the astir logical mode to lick monopolistic practices.

I fishy we’ll spot immoderate originative behavioral remedies instead. The banning of exclusive contracts feels similar a no-brainer.

Of each the solutions retired there, requiring Google to supply APIs of Google hunt results, ranking signals, etc. is by acold the astir intriguing idea.

I cannot adjacent ideate a satellite wherever we person entree to that accusation close now. And I tin lone anticipation that we bash spot the emergence of an Apple hunt engine. It feels agelong overdue for it to participate this abstraction and commencement disrupting.

Even with Google appealing Mehta’s decision, the remedy proposals volition proceed ahead.

In November, the DOJ volition record a much refined framework, and past Google volition suggest its ain remedies successful December.

More resources:

• Google Found In Violation of Antitrust Law, Judge Rules
• Google Faces Potential Breakup: How DOJ Ruling Could Reshape Search
• Google Ranking Systems & Signals 2024

Featured Image: David Gyung/Shutterstock