Automattic’s Response To WP Engine Lawsuit Reframes Narrative via @sejournal, @martinibuster

Lawyers for Matt Mullenweg and Automattic filed a question to disregard the suit from WP Engine, offering a antithetic position connected the dispute’s underlying causes.

The question to disregard claims that the 1 causing harm isn’t Mullenweg and Automattic but WP Engine, asserting that WP Engine is compelling the suspect to supply resources and enactment escaped of complaint arsenic good arsenic to restrict the Mullenweg’s quality to explicit his opinions astir WP Engine’s practices.

The question to disregard begins by accuses WP Engine of selectively choosing caller events arsenic ground for their complaint. It past fills successful the parts that were near out, opening with the founding of WordPress implicit 2 decades agone erstwhile Matt co-founded a mode to make websites that democratized Internet publishing successful the process. The question outlines however his enactment devoted thousands of person-years to increasing the platform, yet getting it to a constituent wherever it present generates an estimated $10 cardinal dollars per twelvemonth for thousands of companies and freelancers.

The constituent of the archetypal portion of the question is to explicate that Mullenweg and Automattic enactment the unfastened root WordPress task due to the fact that the task depends connected a “symbiotic” narration betwixt the WordPress assemblage and those who are a portion of it, including web hosts similar WP Engine.

“But the occurrence and vitality of WordPress depends connected a supportive and symbiotic narration with those successful the WordPress community.”

After establishing what the assemblage is, however it was founded and the relation of Mullenweg and Automattic arsenic a powerfully supportive of the community, it past paints a representation of WP Engine arsenic a institution that reaps immense benefits from the unpaid enactment and donated clip without adequately giving backmost to the community. This is the portion that Mullenweg and Automattic consciousness is near retired of WP Engine’s complaint, that Mullenweg was expressing his sentiment that not lone should WP Engine should supply much enactment to the assemblage and that Mullenweg was responding to the menace posed by the plaintiff’s behavior.

The question explains:

“Plaintiff WP Engine’s behaviour poses a menace to that community. WP Engine is simply a website hosting work built connected the backmost of WordPress bundle and controlled by the backstage equity steadfast Silver Lake, which claims implicit $100B of assets nether management.

…In summation to WordPress software, WP Engine besides uses assorted of the escaped resources connected the Website, and its Complaint alleges that entree to the Website is now, apparently, captious for its business.”

Lastly, the opening portion of the motion, which explains the defendant’s broadside of the dispute, asserts that the defendant’s behaviour was wholly wrong their ineligible close due to the fact that nary statement exists betwixt WordPress and WP Engine that guarantees them entree to WordPress resources and that WP Engine astatine nary clip tried to unafraid rights to access.

The papers continues:

“But the Complaint does not (and cannot) allege that WP Engine has immoderate statement with Matt (or anyone other for that matter) that gives WP Engine the close to usage the Website’s resources. The Complaint does not (and cannot) allege that WP Engine astatine immoderate clip has attempted to unafraid that close from Matt oregon elsewhere.

Instead, WP Engine has exploited the escaped resources provided by the Website to marque hundreds of millions of dollars annually. WP Engine has done truthful portion refusing to meaningfully springiness backmost to the WordPress community, and portion unfairly trading disconnected the goodwill associated with the WordPress and WooCommerce trademarks.”

Accusation Of Trademark Infringement

The question to disregard filed by Mullenweg and Automattic impeach WP Engine of trademark infringement, a assertion that has been astatine the bosom of of Mullenweg’s dispute, which the ineligible effect says is simply a quality that Mullenweg attempted to amicably resoluteness successful private.

The ineligible papers asserts:

“In 2021, for the archetypal time, WP Engine incorporated the WordPress trademark into the sanction of its ain merchandise offering which it called “Headless WordPress,” infringing that trademark and violating the explicit presumption of the WordPress Foundation Trademark Policy, which prohibits the usage of the WordPress trademarks successful merchandise names. And, implicit time, WP Engine has progressively accrued its usage and prominence of the WordPress trademark passim its selling materials, yet utilizing that people good beyond the recognized limits of nominative just use.”

What Triggered The Dispute

The defendants assertion that WP Engine benefited from the unfastened root assemblage but declined to go an progressive spouse successful the unfastened root community. The defendants assertion that they tried to bring WP Engine into the assemblage arsenic portion of the symbiotic narration but WP Engine refused.

The question to disregard is absorbing due to the fact that it archetypal argues that WP Engine didn’t person an statement with Automattic for usage of the WordPress trademark nor did it had an statement for the rights to person entree to WordPress resources. Then it shows however the defendants tried to scope an statement and that it was WP Engine’s refusal to “meaningfully springiness backmost to the WordPress community” and travel to an statement with Automattic is what triggered the dispute.

The papers explains:

“Matt has attempted to rise these concerns with WP Engine and to scope an amicable solution for the bully of the community. In private, Matt besides has encouraged WP Engine to springiness backmost to the ecosystem from which it has taken truthful much. Preserving and maintaining the resources made disposable connected the Website requires sizeable effort and investment—an effort and concern that Matt makes to payment those with a shared consciousness of mission. WP Engine does not
embrace that mission.

WP Engine and Silver Lake cannot expect to nett disconnected the backmost of others without carrying immoderate of the weight—and that is each Matt has asked of them. For example, Matt suggested that WP Engine either execute a licence for the Foundation’s WordPress trademarks oregon dedicate 8 percent of its gross to the further improvement of the unfastened root WordPress software.”

Mullenweg Had Two Choices

The supra is what Mullenweg and Automattic assertion is astatine the bosom of the dispute, the unwillingness of WP Engine to scope an statement with Automattic and go a stronger spouse with the community. The question to disregard accidental that WP Engine’s refusal to scope an statement near Mullenweg fewer choices of what to bash next, arsenic the question explains:.

“When it became abundantly wide to Matt that WP Engine had nary involvement successful giving back, Matt was near with 2 choices: (i) proceed to let WP Engine to unfairly exploit the escaped resources of the Website, usage the WordPress and WooCommerce trademarks without authorization, which would besides endanger the precise beingness of those trademarks, and stay soundless connected the antagonistic interaction of its behaviour oregon (ii) garbage to let WP Engine to bash that and request publically that WP Engine bash much to enactment the community.”

Disputes Look Different From Each Side

Matt Mullenweg and Automattic person been portrayed successful an unflattering airy since the quality with WP Engine burst into public. The question to disregard communicates that Mullenweg’s motivations were successful defence of the WordPress community, proving that each quality looks antithetic depending connected who is telling the story. Now it’s up to the justice to decide.

Featured Image by Shutterstock/santypan