Why we’re hardwired to believe SEO myths (and how to spot them!)

2 years ago 262
ARTICLE AD BOX

Give idiosyncratic a food and they’ll EAT for 1 day. Teach idiosyncratic to food and they’ll EAT for a lifetime. Yes, that’s an SEO pun. It’s besides the extremity of this article.

If you popular into either of the fantastic SEO communities connected Twitter oregon LinkedIn, you’ll inevitably brushwood immoderate communal SEO myths:

  • “Longer dwell clip means a bully idiosyncratic experience, truthful it indispensable beryllium a ranking factor”
  • “A precocious bounce complaint indicates a atrocious idiosyncratic experience, truthful it indispensable beryllium atrocious for SEO”

Social media posts similar these get tons of engagement. As a result, they amplify the myths we effort to squash done repetition, mendacious evidence, and faulty logic. The occupation isn’t constricted to societal media, either. There are plentifulness of high-profile websites that bundle hypotheses arsenic facts due to the fact that readers devour them up.

These myths are a immense occupation due to the fact that they’re reddish herrings. They origin marketers to prioritize projects that won’t amended the content, idiosyncratic experience, oregon Google hunt performance.

So however tin the SEO assemblage rally astir the truth? We tin commencement by doing 2 things:

  1. SEOs indispensable admit our personalities and professions hardwire america to judge myths. We person a heavy tendency for answers, control, and predictability, arsenic good arsenic a fierce distrust of Google.
  2. We request to admit the intelligence and biology factors that power our quality to benignant information from fiction.

So alternatively than busting idiosyncratic myths, let’s inquire ourselves “why?” instead. In different words, let’s larn to fish.

Internal reasons we judge SEO myths

Let’s excavation into immoderate interior factors, specified arsenic our thoughts and feelings, that power our beliefs.

1. SEOs request operation and control

SEO is simply a fascinating subdivision of selling due to the fact that our show is driven by a perpetually evolving algorithm that we don’t control. In fact, determination were more than 5,000 Google algorithm updates successful 2021 alone.

In different words, SEOs unrecorded successful a satellite of crippling dependency. Even the top-ranking signals that we cognize astir tin fluctuate based connected the industry, query, oregon disposable contented wrong Google’s index. For example, if you negociate websites successful the concern oregon wellness space, E-A-T is critical. If you people quality content, past recency is precise important.

To summation a consciousness of operation and control, we look for much ways to power outcomes. But determination are 2 problems with that approach:

  • We overestimate the interaction of idiosyncratic ranking factors
  • We falsely judge thing is simply a Google ranking origin that is not

Our request to amplify our ain level of power is supported by psychology. A 2016 survey revealed an individual’s request for operation made them much apt to believe successful a conspiracy theory.

“The quality inclination to admit patterns adjacent erstwhile nary beryllium is shown to person applications successful user behavior. The existent probe demonstrates that arsenic one’s idiosyncratic request for operation (PNS) increases (that is, requiring predictability and disfavoring uncertainty), mendacious user signifier perceptions emerge.”

If you find yourself waffling betwixt information and fiction, don’t fto your tendency for power dictate your last decision.

2. The primal request to admit patterns

The quality encephalon is fantabulous astatine recognizing patterns. Throughout history, we’ve relied connected that quality to marque amended decisions and guarantee the endurance of our species. Unfortunately, we’re truthful bully astatine spotting patterns that we besides fabricate them.

False signifier designation has respective drawbacks –

  • It mightiness power SEO decisions that could person a sitewide impact
  • If you overstate the transportation publicly, others mightiness misinterpret it arsenic fact

An fantabulous illustration surfaced connected Twitter recently. Google’s John Mueller was asked if adding excessively galore links to your site’s main navigation could interaction Google Discover traffic. The idiosyncratic who asked the question ran respective tests and saw affirmative results, but Mueller said it was simply an absorbing correlation.

I'd inactive spell with "unrelated". As mentioned successful our docs astatine https://t.co/kkA2QTzIJs "Given the serendipitous quality of Discover, postulation from Discover is little predictable oregon dependable erstwhile compared to Search, and is considered supplemental to your Search traffic."

— 🦙 johnmu.xml (personal) 🦙 (@JohnMu) April 14, 2022

“I’d inactive spell with ’unrelated’. As mentioned successful our docs: Given the serendipitous quality of Discover, postulation from Discover is little predictable oregon dependable erstwhile compared to Search, and is considered supplemental to your Search traffic.”

Fortunately, this idiosyncratic went consecutive to the root for an reply alternatively of publishing a lawsuit survey that could person had superior implications for website navigation decisions.

3. Confirmation bias

It’s well-documented that radical judge accusation that supports their beliefs and cull accusation that doesn’t. It’s a primordial trait that evolved erstwhile we began to signifier societal groups. Early humans surrounded themselves with others who thought and acted the aforesaid mode to guarantee their survival.

One of the astir celebrated confirmation bias studies comes from Stanford. For the study, researchers segmented students into 2 opposing groups based connected their beliefs astir superior punishment.

One radical supported superior punishment and believed it reduced crime. The different opposed it and believed it had nary interaction connected crime.

Each radical was asked to respond to 2 studies, 1 which supported their views, and 1 which contradicted them. Both groups recovered the survey that aligned with their beliefs overmuch much credible, and each became much entrenched successful their archetypal beliefs.

SEO practitioners are peculiarly prone to confirmation bias due to the fact that we’re terrified of being wrong. We hypothesize, test, build, optimize, and iterate. If we’re incorrect excessively often, we’ll discarded clip and money, and we could hazard our estimation and our jobs.

We request to beryllium close truthful severely that we whitethorn judge myths that corroborate our beliefs alternatively than admit failure.

4. Lack of spot successful Google

It’s harmless to accidental astir SEOs don’t spot Google. That has led to immoderate of the longest-running SEO myths I could find. For example, adjacent aft 7 years of repeated rejections from Google, galore SEO experts inactive judge engagement is simply a ranking signal.

Here’s John Mueller shooting down the engagement story successful 2015:

“I don’t deliberation we adjacent spot what radical are doing connected your website. If they are filling retired forms oregon not, if they are converting and really buying something… So if we can’t spot that, past that is thing we cannot instrumentality into account. So from my constituent of view, that is not thing I’d truly dainty arsenic a ranking factor.”

Nearly 7 years later, successful March 2022, John was asked the aforesaid question again, and his effect was beauteous overmuch the same:

“So I don’t deliberation we would usage engagement arsenic a factor.”

And yet, the SEOs piled connected successful the comments. I promote you to work them if you privation a consciousness of the aggravated level of mistrust. Essentially, SEOs overanalyzed Mueller’s words, questioned his honesty, and claimed helium was misinformed due to the fact that they had contradictory insider information.

5. Impostor syndrome

Even the astir seasoned SEO professionals admit they’ve felt the symptom of impostor syndrome. You tin easy find discussions connected Reddit, Twitter, and LinkedIn astir however we question our ain level of knowledge. That’s particularly existent successful nationalist settings erstwhile we’re surrounded by our peers.

Not agelong agone Azeem Ahmad and Izzie Smith chatted astir impostor syndrome. Here’s what Izzie said:

“It’s truly hard to enactment yourself retired determination and stock your learnings. We’re each truly afraid. I deliberation astir of america person this impostor syndrome that’s telling america we’re not bully enough.”

This contributes to SEO myths successful respective ways. First, it erodes self-confidence, which makes individuals much prone to judge myths. Second, it prevents folks who mightiness privation to situation inaccurate accusation from speaking retired publically due to the fact that they’re acrophobic they’ll beryllium attacked.

Needless to say, that enables myths to dispersed passim the broader community.

The champion mode to combat impostor syndrome is to guarantee SEO communities are harmless and supportive of caller members and caller ideas. Be respectful, open-minded, and accepting. If much folks talk retired erstwhile thing doesn’t consciousness accurate, past we tin support immoderate troublesome myths successful check.

External reasons we judge SEO myths

Now let’s research the outer forces, similar peers and publishers, that origin america to judge SEO myths.

1. Peer pressure

Peer unit is intimately related to impostor syndrome, but it comes from the outside. It’s a feeling of coercion from peers, whether a ample radical of SEOs, a wide known adept oregon a adjacent mentor oregon colleague.

Because humans are societal creatures, our impulse to acceptable successful often overpowers our tendency to beryllium right. When thing doesn’t consciousness right, we spell with the travel anyhow for fearfulness of being ostracized. In fact, societal impervious can beryllium much persuasive than purely evidence-based proof.

I asked the Twitter SEO assemblage if anyone ever felt compelled to judge an SEO ranking factor arsenic information based connected fashionable opinion. Several folks replied, and determination was an absorbing taxable astir website code.

“Back successful 2014, a web developer told maine helium genuinely believed text-to-code ratio was a ranking factor. For a while, I believed him due to the fact that helium made convincing arguments and helium was the archetypal developer I met who had an sentiment astir SEO.”

—  Alice Roussel

“Years and years agone I wanted codification prime to beryllium a ranking factor. Many thought it was due to the fact that it made consciousness to reward well-written code. But it ne'er was. Browsers had to beryllium precise forgiving due to the fact that astir sites were truthful severely built.”

—  Simon Cox

Similar to combatting impostor syndrome, if we make a much tolerable SEO assemblage that’s consenting to respectfully statement issues, we’ll each payment from much reliable information.

2. Outdated information

If you people contented astir SEO, past you’ll beryllium blameworthy of spreading SEO myths astatine immoderate point. Google updates its algorithms thousands of times each year, which means assumptions are disproven and once-good proposal becomes outdated.

Trusted publishers person a work to refresh oregon region inaccurate contented to forestall SEO misconceptions from spreading.

For example, successful 2019 Google changed however it handles outbound links. It introduced 2 caller nexus attributes into the nofollow family, UGC and sponsored, and began to dainty each 3 of these arsenic hints alternatively of ignoring nofollow links.

So if you wrote astir nexus attributes anterior to September 2019, your proposal is astir apt retired of date.

Unfortunately, astir SEOs update contented due to the fact that it’s underperforming, not due to the fact that it’s wrong. So possibly publishers should enactment integrity supra show to fortify our community.

3. Jumping connected trends

Sometimes SEO myths detonate due to the fact that the facts can’t support up with the virality of the myth. One of my favourite examples is the LSI keyword trend. This 1 pops up connected Twitter from clip to time, and thankfully Bill Slawski is speedy to quash it.

Trend-based myths spell viral due to the fact that they pat into the fearfulness of missing retired (FOMO), and SEOs hatred to miss retired connected the accidental to summation a competitory advantage. They besides resonate with SEOs due to the fact that they look to connection a concealed glimpse into Google’s achromatic box.

Although trends yet fade, they volition stay a thorn successful our broadside arsenic agelong arsenic the archetypal sources stay unchanged.

4. Correlation vs causation

The astir hard myths to bust are those backed by data. No substance however galore times Google debunks them, they won’t dice if folks travel equipped with lawsuit studies.

Take nonstop lucifer domains (EMD) for example. This article lists respective reasons wherefore EMDs are bully for SEO, utilizing Hotels.com arsenic a lawsuit study. But it’s a classical chickenhearted and ovum argument. Does the tract fertile fig 1 for “hotels” due to the fact that it’s an EMD? Or is it due to the fact that the proprietor intelligibly understood SEO strategy and prioritized keyword research, nexus building, interior links, leafage speed, and high-quality contented selling for the past 27 years?

We besides can’t discount the information that the domain has 42 cardinal backlinks.

But if you privation to perceive it straight from the horse’s mouth, Google’s John Mueller says EMDs supply nary SEO bonus. Here’s what helium said connected Reddit:

“There’s nary concealed SEO bonus for having your keywords successful the domain name. And for those coming with “but determination are keyword domains ranking well” — of course, you tin besides fertile good with a domain that has keywords successful it. But you tin fertile good with different domain names too, and a domain won’t fertile good conscionable due to the fact that it has keywords successful it.”

This is evidently correlation, not causation.

To beryllium clear, I afloat enactment running SEO tests to larn much astir Google’s algorithm. But it’s incredibly hard to make a awesome vacuum that prevents extracurricular influences from skewing your results. And adjacent if you negociate to isolate 1 ranking factor, you person nary mode of knowing however beardown the awesome is successful narration to different signals. In a full vacuum, 1 awesome whitethorn win. But successful the wilderness of Google, it whitethorn beryllium truthful anemic that it’s virtually nonexistent.

Furthermore, the awesome whitethorn lone use to definite types of content. We’ve seen awesome fluctuations earlier regarding merchandise reviews and E-A-T successful YMYL spaces. So adjacent if information suggests thing mightiness amended integrated rankings, however reliable is the information, and however important is the signal?

All this is to accidental that we should beryllium precise cautious erstwhile proclaiming caller ranking factors, particularly if they contradict Google’s statements oregon stray excessively acold from universally measuring idiosyncratic experience.

5. It’s plausible, but not measurable

This radical of myths is rooted successful logic, which makes them peculiarly unsafe and sticky. Usually, they travel a elemental formula: if A = B, and B = C, past A = C.

Here’s an example:

  • Google wants to fertile contented that provides a bully idiosyncratic experience
  • If a webpage has a precocious bounce rate, it indispensable supply a atrocious idiosyncratic experience
  • Therefore, a precocious bounce complaint is atrocious for SEO

This seems to marque sense, right? Yet, Google has said galore times they can’t spot what users bash connected your website, and they don’t look astatine bounce rate.

I’ve seen the aforesaid statement applied to dwell time, clip connected page, SERP click-through rates (CTR), and truthful on. To beryllium clear, Google says CTR  does not thrust integrated hunt motor rankings due to the fact that that would origin results to beryllium overrun with spammy, low-quality content.

Most often these myths stem from competing views astir what a good idiosyncratic experience looks similar and however to measurement it. What constitutes a bully acquisition for 1 benignant of hunt query mightiness beryllium a unspeakable acquisition for another. This deficiency of consistency makes it virtually intolerable to place metrics that tin beryllium deployed universally crossed each websites.

In different words, if imaginable idiosyncratic acquisition signals beryllium connected excessively galore factors, Google can’t usage them. That’s wherefore they launched the page acquisition update successful 2021 which quantifies idiosyncratic acquisition with specific, cosmopolitan metrics.

Here’s your sportfishing pole

In galore cases, SEO myths autumn into much than 1 of the supra categories which makes them adjacent much hard to dispel. That’s wherefore we support seeing societal media posts falsely identifying ranking factors similar keyword density, domain authority, conversions, and meta keywords.

If you recognize a fewer basal concepts astir ranking factors, you’ll beryllium amended equipped to benignant information from fabrication and prioritize SEO initiatives that thrust much integrated traffic.

Ask yourself these 5 questions erstwhile you odor the stench of a myth:

  • Is it quantifiable and measurable?
  • Is it scalable?
  • Is it broadly oregon universally true, oregon does it beryllium connected the user?
  • Does it enactment Google’s goals of delivering a amended idiosyncratic experience?
  • Has Google confirmed oregon denied it publicly?

If you tin cheque each of those boxes, past you whitethorn person a valid ranking origin connected your hands. But don’t instrumentality my connection for it. Run immoderate tests, inquire immoderate friends, usage logic, and corroborate your theory. And if each other fails, conscionable inquire John Mueller.


Jonas Sickler is simply a published writer and integer marketer. He writes astir SEO, marque reputation, lawsuit attention, and marketing. His proposal has appeared successful hundreds of publications, including Forbes, CNBC, CMI, and Search Engine Watch. He tin beryllium recovered connected Twitter @JonasSickler.

Subscribe to the Search Engine Watch newsletter for insights connected SEO, the hunt landscape, hunt marketing, integer marketing, leadership, podcasts, and more.

Join the speech with america on LinkedIn and Twitter.