Duplichecker Review for 2022: Read This Before Using

Duplicate contented is simply a large origin for interest for tract owners.

Google favors sites with caller and unsocial content. The main extremity of their hunt engine is to springiness the champion effect for a user’s hunt query, right? A portion of contented connected 5 different sites astir apt doesn’t acceptable those criteria.

Also, Google spiders won’t cognize which is the archetypal portion if different tract copies your contented word-for-word. They’ll fertile little than a wholly unsocial portion of contented since they don’t cognize which deserves the higher spot.

The atrocious news? Your contented is escaped and casual to access. People tin chopped and paste your contented onto their ain site, resulting successful duplicate content—which is highly atrocious for SEO.

One instrumentality aiming to assistance tract owners combat it is Duplichecker.

We enactment this instrumentality to the trial to find out:

• What Duplichecker is bully (and not truthful good) at
• The accuracy of Duplichecker
• Duplichecker vs. Copyscape
• How to usage Duplichecker to find plagiarized content

What is Duplichecker?

Duplichecker is simply a plagiarism checker instrumentality that tin find instances of duplicate content.

It scans the net for the aforesaid sentences, phrases, oregon paragraphs connected your website and points you to outer URLs with the aforesaid content.

Here’s an illustration of duplicate contented copied from our usher to Private Blog Networks:

How Good is Duplichecker?

We cognize what Duplichecker is expected to do. But the existent question is: Does it bash the job?

I spent a fewer hours playing astir with Duplichecker, judging however galore instances of plagiarized contented it could prime up.

But during that testing, I recovered immoderate bully parts astir the tool—along with others that amusement Duplichecker inactive needs immoderate improvement:

The champion parts of Duplichecker

Arguably the champion portion astir Duplichecker is the information it’s free.

Unlike different plagiarized contented tools similar Siteliner and Copyscape, Duplichecker is wholly escaped to use—and you don’t request an relationship to usage it.

Another payment of Duplichecker is the information you tin upload respective record types, including:

• .tex
• .txt
• .doc
• .docx
• .odt
• .pdf
• .rtf

Or, you tin propulsion contented from a URL. Simply plug the nexus wherever your contented is published and find a database of duplicate results recovered elsewhere:

The Duplichecker instrumentality is portion of a wider subdivision of selling tools.

That’s wherefore the Duplichecker diagnostic tin besides analyse grammar by hitting 1 of the 2 options below:

Both tools are escaped and could regenerate costly tools similar Grammarly Pro.

Duplichecker isn’t truthful bully astatine it…

There’s nary uncertainty that Duplichecker has tons of benefits. However, determination are besides areas that the instrumentality lacks.

One of those is the connection number limit. You tin lone person 1,000 words per search, which could beryllium an contented if you cheque whether long-form contented has been plagiarized.

(You tin enactment astir this bounds by breaking your substance into 1,000-word chunks. However, you won’t find instances wherever antithetic blocks of contented are utilized due to the fact that you can’t cheque the full portion simultaneously.)

Another downfall is that immoderate contented gets weirdly formatted erstwhile plugged from a URL. Here’s an example:

But unfortunately, the glitches don’t halt there.

I copied a chunk of substance straight into the editor, and it ended up adding hundreds of other lines:

This mistake, combined with the overwhelming partition of ads connected the tool’s homepage, gives it a “buggy” feeling. It doesn’t consciousness similar a nonrecreational tool.

Finally, it’s worthy noting that you can’t tally a duplicate contented cheque site-wide with Duplichecker. You request to plug the URL successful 1 by one, which tin get time-consuming (especially if you person a large website.)

Other tools—including Copyscape—can bash site-wide searches.

How reliable is Duplichecker?

The abbreviated reply is not very. Granted, it does prime up immoderate instances of plagiarized content, but the accuracy isn’t spot on.

I had a fewer issues utilizing the tool, including:

Not each contented gets picked up

During my testing, I copied a conception of a impermanent station I’d written for Sellbrite into Duplichecker. The archetypal portion was besides syndicated to Business2Community, truthful I knew determination was astatine slightest 1 lawsuit of duplicate content.

However, Duplichecker didn’t prime either up. It marked my contented arsenic 100% unique:

It can’t recognize (some) quotes

Similarly, Duplichecker doesn’t look to beryllium capable to grip quotes.

For example, I entered this punctuation successful Duplichecker: “The advancement of rivers to the water is not truthful accelerated arsenic that of antheral to error.”

The instrumentality recovered conscionable 1 lawsuit of plagiarized content:

…But erstwhile you benignant that successful Google with quotation marks, you tin spot hundreds of URLs containing precisely the aforesaid content:

Both of those findings alteration search-by-search

We cognize that Duplichecker can’t find syndicated contented oregon quotes, right?

Those things aren’t consistent.

I tested a station I wrote for ConversionXL, which was besides syndicated connected Business2Community. One of the quotes included successful my nonfiction did get picked up arsenic being duplicate, on with the archetypal post:

But yet again, the syndicated mentation connected Business2Community didn’t get flagged.

You tin besides spot that Duplichecker marked 33% of my contented arsenic plagiarized, with the remaining 67% being “unique.”

It wasn’t—the contented was lifted straight from the archetypal post, yet Duplichecker lone considered 3 paragraphs arsenic being duplicated elsewhere.

How does Duplichecker comparison to Copyscape?

There are tons of plagiarized contented tools you tin use. One of the astir celebrated is Copyscape. So, however does Duplichecker’s instrumentality compare?

Let’s commencement by discussing the astir evident differentiator: Cost.

Duplichecker is escaped and checks up to 1,000 words. You don’t request an relationship to usage it, and determination aren’t immoderate limits to however galore times you tin usage the instrumentality (so agelong arsenic you’re beneath the connection number connected each search.)

Copyscape besides has a escaped version. However, they besides connection a Premium plan, which includes a scan of 10,000 pages, excludes sites you already cognize about, and helps you travel up with tract owners erstwhile you inquire them to region oregon alteration the duplicate content.

The terms for Premium is 3c per hunt (up to 200 words), positive 1c per other 100 words.

I’ve besides mentioned that Duplichecker lets you cheque for duplicate contented from uploaded files. You can’t bash this connected Copyscape, which makes it hard to compare.

For example: When comparing our station connected backlinks, I plugged the URL into Copyscape and got tons much results:

It showed lone 1 connected Duplichecker due to the fact that I had to usage a smaller illustration of content:

Plus, Copyscape has a Copysentry feature. You get emails erstwhile caller duplicate contented is recovered without having to manually cheque for it. This costs $4.95/month but is worthy the tiny disbursal if it means you don’t request to retrieve to hunt for plagiarized content.

The bottommost line? Duplichecker is suitable for smaller businesses oregon sites without overmuch content… But it’s not precise accurate.

Copyscape is the amended enactment for larger businesses, those with tons of content, oregon those who wage for content. It’s besides amended to usage it for long-form contented since determination isn’t a connection number bounds connected the substance you’re searching for.

How to usage Duplichecker to find duplicate content

Ready to commencement searching for duplicate contented taken from your website? While it isn’t accurate, it picks up immoderate instances of plagiarized content.

Here’s however you tin usage the instrumentality to find it:

1. Add your content

Start by adding your contented to the Duplichecker tool.

You tin bash this done immoderate of the record types we shared above. Or, adhd the URL of the contented you privation to hunt for:

Remember that you mightiness request to chopped immoderate substance if it’s implicit 1,000 words long.

2. Check your scores

After entering your text, scroll down and you’ll spot a study containing overmuch of your contented is plagiarized, unique, oregon has a related-meaning elsewhere:

You privation most—if not all—of your contented to beryllium wholly unique.

Remember: It’s atrocious for SEO if you’ve got contented connected your tract that exists elsewhere, too.

3. Investigate duplicates

Beneath your people report, you’ll spot a database of URLs with akin contented to yours.

Click “Compare Results” and you’ll spot the different tract with your duplicate contented highlighted:

Check however overmuch of your contented is duplicated connected this site.

For example: Is it a afloat blog station oregon conscionable a fewer sentences? A afloat blog station mightiness request much terrible enactment than a fewer sentences.

It’s besides important to cheque the benignant of contented that has been duplicated. A punctuation from your blog station that references it arsenic a root mightiness not beryllium bad. But if they’re wholly ripped disconnected your contented without giving credit, that’s an issue.

4. Change the duplicate content

We already cognize that duplicate contented is simply a immense SEO problem. So, we privation to find immoderate instances of plagiarized contented and alteration it.

There are 2 ways you tin bash this:

1. Contact the tract proprietor and inquire them to region it. This is the easiest mode to region duplicate contented if you make archetypal content. Find the email addresses of whoever runs the site, and archer them they’ve taken your contented without permission. You tin politely inquire them to region the duplicate content. (If they don’t and your contented is copyrighted, you could contented a cease and desist letter—or endanger ineligible action.)
2. Rewrite your ain content. Unfortunately, the spammers who’ve duplicated your contented mightiness not respond to your emails. The lone option, successful this case, is to rewrite your content. You could usage Duplichecker’s add-on Article Rewriting instrumentality for this. However, carnivore successful caput that you mightiness request to bash this each clip your contented is plagiarized successful the future.

Does Duplichecker prevention your work?

Considering that it is simply a escaped tool, you can’t assistance but deliberation determination is simply a drawback somewhere. But remainder assured, Duplichecker does not prevention immoderate contented oregon enactment you taxable for review. Their algorithms are not designed to prevention immoderate contented to their database, beryllium it images oregon different forms of content.

Final thoughts connected Duplichecker

Our last connection connected Duplichecker? It’s a good, escaped instrumentality to person successful your instrumentality stack—especially if you nutrient contented for your website.

However, it does deficiency successful circumstantial areas. It’s incapable to prime up quotes oregon syndicated contented and astir apt won’t amusement each lawsuit wherever your contented has been plagiarized.

The bottommost line? I’d urge Duplichecker to tiny businesses with constricted contented production. But if you nutrient tons of SEO content oregon put successful contented from freelance writers, you’d beryllium amended disconnected with a much reliable alternate similar Copyscape.